Skip Navigation


Enterprise and Society Advance Access originally published online on June 13, 2008
Enterprise and Society 2008 9(3):419-421; doi:10.1093/es/khn050
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
9/3/419    most recent
khn050v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Alfred Chandler and the Importance of Organization

Geoffrey Jones

GEOFFREY JONES is the Isidor Straus Professor of Business History at the Harvard Business School. He previously taught at the universities of Cambridge and Reading, and the London School of Economics, in Great Britain. His books on the history of global business include Multinationals and Global Capitalism (2005). He is currently co-editor of Business History Review

Contact information: gjones@hbs.edu.

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Alfred D. Chandler entered my professional life incrementally rather than dramatically. As a student of economic history at Cambridge University in Britain in the early 1970s, I barely encountered his name. British universities had their own long traditions in business and economic history, including a strong interest in entrepreneurship and in government policies toward industry. Most British scholars were not especially enthusiastic about ideas from across the Atlantic, whether the methodological approach of the new economic history of Robert Fogel, or Chandler's organizational synthesis. Cambridge was an especially closed academic world, with a strong assumption that little that happened outside its delightful campus could be really important. It was not until 1979, when . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?