Skip Navigation


Enterprise and Society Advance Access originally published online on October 24, 2006
Enterprise and Society 2006 7(4):832-834; doi:10.1093/es/khl064
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
7/4/832    most recent
khl064v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Harold James. Family Capitalism: Wendels, Haniels, Falcks, and the Continental European Model. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2006. xii + 434 pp. ISBN 0-674-02181-9, $39.95 (paper).

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

In recent years, revising or amending Alfred D. Chandler’s thesis on the rise of large-scale business enterprises has become an industry unto itself. A decade ago, the most significant challenges to Chandler’s visible hand appeared to come from those who espoused both the contemporary and the historical virtues of flexible specialization. More recently, it appears that advocates of the family firm have begun to stake their claim to a part of Chandler’s sizable inheritance. However, just as the introduction of flexibility into the historical literature reflected a particular . . . [Full Text of this Article]

James A. Jaffe

University of Wisconsin-Whitewater


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?